Footnote code not parsed? #33

New issue

Closed

opened 2025-07-02 18:56:04 +02:00 by ajlewis2 · 1 comment

ajlewis2 commented

2025-07-02 18:56:04 +02:00

Footnote in post using

[^1]
[^1]: footnote-text

Output is the actual text of the code for the first line and nothing at all for the footnote line at the bottom of the page.

I tried this using commonmark (the Default) and also pandoc in the config file.

I ran the file through pandoc
pandoc -i test.md -o test.html
and the footnote appears as expected.

Is this format not acceptable?

Footnote in post using ``` [^1] [^1]: footnote-text ``` Output is the actual text of the code for the first line and nothing at all for the footnote line at the bottom of the page. I tried this using commonmark (the Default) and also pandoc in the config file. I ran the file through pandoc `pandoc -i test.md -o test.html` and the footnote appears as expected. Is this format not acceptable?

ajlewis2 closed this issue

2025-07-13 23:37:24 +02:00

ajlewis2 commented

2025-07-18 23:30:58 +02:00

Author

The above code for using footnotes is correct.

This in config.sh.local solved my problem.
MARKDOWN_PROCESSOR="pandoc"

"commonmark" does not handle the footnotes
I think I didn't make the above entry correctly when I tried pandoc previously.

The above code for using footnotes is correct. This in config.sh.local solved my problem. MARKDOWN_PROCESSOR="pandoc" "commonmark" does not handle the footnotes I think I didn't make the above entry correctly when I tried pandoc previously.

No labels

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: stefano/BSSG#33

No description provided.

Rows
Columns