Footnotes #32

Closed
opened 2025-07-02 18:53:33 +02:00 by ajlewis2 · 0 comments

Footnote in post using
`1

Output is the actual text of the code for the first line and nothing at all for the footnote line at the bottom of the page.

I tried this using commonmark (the Default) and also pandoc in the config file.

I ran the file through pandoc
pandoc -i test.md -o test.html
and the footnote appears as expected.

Is this format not acceptable?


  1. footnote-text` ↩︎

Footnote in post using `[^1] [^1]: footnote-text` Output is the actual text of the code for the first line and nothing at all for the footnote line at the bottom of the page. I tried this using commonmark (the Default) and also pandoc in the config file. I ran the file through pandoc `pandoc -i test.md -o test.html` and the footnote appears as expected. Is this format not acceptable?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: stefano/BSSG#32
No description provided.