73 lines
3.2 KiB
Text
73 lines
3.2 KiB
Text
## On The Evolution Of Ngaro Into Nga
|
|
|
|
When I decided to begin work on what became RETRO 12, I knew
|
|
the process would involve updating Ngaro, the virtual machine
|
|
that RETRO 10 and 11 ran on.
|
|
|
|
Ngaro rose out of an earlier experimental virtual machine I had
|
|
written back in 2005-2006. This earlier VM, called Maunga, was
|
|
very close to what Ngaro ended up being, though it had a very
|
|
different approach to I/O. (All I/O in Maunga was intended to be
|
|
memory mapped; Ngaro adopted a port based I/O system).
|
|
|
|
Ngaro itself evolved along with RETRO, gaining features like
|
|
automated skipping of NOPs and a LOOP opcode to help improve
|
|
performance. But the I/O model proved to be a problem. When I
|
|
created Ngaro, I had the idea that I would always be able to
|
|
assume a console/terminal style environment. The assumption was
|
|
that all code would be entered via the keyboard (or maybe a
|
|
block editor), and that proved to be the fundamental flaw as
|
|
time went on.
|
|
|
|
As RETRO grew it was evident that the model had some serious
|
|
problems. Need to load code from a file? The VM and language had
|
|
functionality to pretend it was being typed in. Want to run on
|
|
something like a browser, Android, or iOS? The VM would need to
|
|
be implemented in a way that simulates input being typed into
|
|
the VM via a simulated keyboard. And RETRO was built around this.
|
|
I couldn't change it because of a promise to maintain, as much
|
|
as possible, source compatibility for a period of at least five
|
|
years.
|
|
|
|
When the time came to fix this, I decided at the start to keep
|
|
the I/O model separate from the core VM. I also decided that the
|
|
core RETRO language would provide some means of interpreting
|
|
code without requiring an assumption that a traditional terminal
|
|
was being used.
|
|
|
|
So Nga began. I took the opportunity to simplify the instruction
|
|
set to just 26 essential instructions, add support for packing
|
|
multiple instructions per memory location (allowing a long due
|
|
reduction in memory footprint), and to generally just make a far
|
|
simpler design.
|
|
|
|
I've been pleased with Nga. On its own it really isn't useful
|
|
though. So with RETRO I embed it into a larger framework that
|
|
adds some basic I/O functionality. The *interfaces* handle the
|
|
details of passing tokens into the language and capturing any
|
|
output. They are free to do this in whatever model makes most
|
|
sense on a given platform.
|
|
|
|
So far I've implemented:
|
|
|
|
- a scripting interface, reading input from a file and
|
|
offering file i/o, gopher, and reading from stdin, and
|
|
sending output to stdout.
|
|
- an interactive interface, built around ncurses, reading
|
|
input from stdin, and displaying output to a scrolling
|
|
buffer.
|
|
- an iOS interface, built around a text editor, directing
|
|
output to a separate interface pane.
|
|
- an interactive block editor, using a gopher-based block
|
|
data store. Output is displayed to stdout, and input is
|
|
done via the blocks being evaluated or by reading from
|
|
stdin.
|
|
|
|
In all cases, the only common I/O word that has to map to an
|
|
exposed instruction is `putc`, to display a single character to
|
|
some output device. There is no requirement for a traditional
|
|
keyboard input model.
|
|
|
|
By doing this I was able to solve the biggest portability issue
|
|
with the RETRO 10/11 model, and make a much simpler, cleaner
|
|
language in the end.
|